Start with the decision
The first question is not which model to use. It is which decision or workflow needs to improve, who owns it, and what being wrong costs.
I build full-stack AI systems that survive real enterprise environments — private LLMs, RAG platforms, decision-intelligence tools, and governed workflows.
Production AI Pipeline
governed · live
Grounded · Sources visible
Reviewed · Human gates
Audited · Trace retained
Rollback · Safe-mode ready
Most of my strongest AI work was built inside confidential enterprise environments. Numbers below use sanitized, modeled, or observed categories.
reduction in selected manual review workflows
Estimated
internal AI systems moved from prototype to live use
Sanitized
annual workflow hours addressed through AI automation
Modeled
deployment under access-control and infrastructure constraints
Observed
Production AI Systems
Live use
Built internal AI systems across aviation operations, enterprise knowledge workflows, and workflow automation.
Sanitized
Private LLM / RAG
Secure retrieval
Designed secure knowledge-assistant workflows with source grounding and department-aware retrieval.
Observed
Operational AI
Decision support
Built decision-intelligence tools for resource planning, recovery, and operational support.
Observed
Governed Deployment
Enterprise-ready
Designed around on-prem infrastructure, SSO/RBAC, auditability, rollback thinking, and production constraints.
Modeled
Sanitized case studies of internal AI systems that went from prototype to live use. Each card links to the case study with full architecture, impact, limitations, and reliability thinking.
I do not start with the model. I start with the decision, the workflow, the user, and the cost of being wrong. The model is one piece of a much larger, governed product.
The first question is not which model to use. It is which decision or workflow needs to improve, who owns it, and what being wrong costs.
Map current handoffs, delays, data sources, failure modes, and approval points before writing a single line of integration code.
Do not build the full AI platform first. Build the smallest version that demonstrably changes a real workflow, then harden from there.
A technically correct AI system is useless if users do not trust it or cannot fit it into their daily work. Adoption is a design problem.
Governance is not a PDF. It lives in access control, audit trails, approval gates, review states, rollback, and human confirmation points.
Production AI needs monitoring, fallback behavior, safe mode, rollback, data-quality checks, and clear ownership. Then iterate.
Three reference architectures that have shaped almost every production AI system I have shipped.
Document ingestion → chunking → embeddings → retrieval → grounded answers → access control
Operational data → rules/constraints → scoring/recommendations → user workflow → audit trail
FastAPI → Postgres → workers → Docker → Nginx → SSO/RBAC → monitoring
A good demo is not a good system. I evaluate AI by grounding, failure modes, human review, operational risk, adoption, and production readiness — not just whether the answer sounds right.
Can the system show where its answer came from?
Where can the system be wrong, incomplete, stale, or misleading?
Which decisions require human confirmation before action?
What happens if the system is slow, unavailable, or wrong?
Are users actually changing how they work because of the system?
Can the system be deployed, monitored, rolled back, and governed?
Each case study covers the operational problem, the system design, the tradeoffs, the impact signal, the limitations, and the reliability thinking.
Most production work was built inside confidential environments. These public demos reproduce the core engineering patterns with mock data, sanitized workflows, and reference code.
On production AI, aviation AI, enterprise governance, decision intelligence, and the gap between AI demos and operational deployment.
Open to applied AI, enterprise AI architecture, LLM systems, aviation AI, and product-focused AI engineering opportunities.
email · linkedin · cv